Benefits of Retaining Residue
High amounts of crop residue (more than 40 percent) can reduce soil erosion by 80 percent. Even a small amount of residue cover (10 percent) can reduce erosion losses by 20 percent.1 Additionally, residue maintains soil moisture, improve soil tilth and quality, reduce nutrient runoff, and provide wildlife cover. These improvements can be related to potential yield benefits and should be considered when managing residue (Table 1). Conservation tillage practices resulting in greater sustainability of cropping systems are being adopted on a wider scale. This comes as the loss of crop productivity correlated to land degradation becomes a global issue.
Table 1. Comparison of water savings and yield on bare soil and residue-covered soil.
Year |
Crop |
Yield (bu/acre) |
Water Savings (inch) |
Residue |
Bare Soil |
Difference |
Yield |
Soil |
Total |
2007 |
Corn |
197 |
172 |
25 |
3.0 |
0.0 |
3.0 |
2008 |
Corn |
186 |
169 |
17 |
2.0 |
1.5 |
3.5 |
2009 |
Soybean |
68 |
58 |
10 |
3.0 |
2.0 |
5.0 |
2010 |
Soybean |
61 |
53 |
8 |
2.5 |
0.0 |
2.5 |
Source: Van Donk, S.J. and Klocke, N.L. 2012. Tillage and crop residue removal effects on evaporation, irrigation requirements, and yield. Proceedings of the 24th Annual Central Plains Irrigation Conference. |
Residue can be managed through harvesting adjustments and tillage; however, tillage may not be desirable in all fields. Depending on crop rotation, additional steps may help decompose residue or allow for residue handling during planting of the next crop.
Harvesting
- For proper residue distribution, combines or similar machines used for harvesting should be equipped with spreaders capable of uniformly distributing residue over the working width of the header.
- Chopper attachments can be adjusted to help with spreading residue the full width. Chaff spreaders attached to the rear axle are most effective for spreading wheat and soybean residues because a larger percentage of the harvested residue is handled by the cleaning shoe of the combine.2
- To reduce evaporative losses and to provide adequate snow retention in no-till and strip-till operations it may be helpful to keep stubble height at a minimum of 25 cm (10 inches) for crops with a row spacing of less than 38 cm (15 inches). For crops with a row spacing of 38 cm (15 inches) or greater, crop stubble height can be kept at a minimum of 38 cm (15 inches).3 This crop height should be present over at least half the field. Leaving stubble taller than 25 cm (10 inches) can help capture more snow and provide better insulation to plant roots.
- After harvest, grazing is another option if residue is accumulating over years, especially for areas that have frozen soils over winter. In a typical corn stalk or grain sorghum grazing period, cattle generally consume 25 to 50 percent of the available residue in 30 to 100 days, depending on stocking density.4
Planting
- Planters equipped with row cleaners should be utilized to move residue and enhance seed to soil contact. Row cleaners can allow earlier soil warming and help reduce the chance of pinning residue into the seed slot. Aim for less than 10 percent residue cover on a zone one-third the row-width.1
- Soil temperatures have been shown to be lower under corn residue compared to soybean residue.5,6 Consider planting dates may be later for fields following corn if measures were not taken at harvest to evenly distribute residue.
- Little to no modification would be needed for planters and drills operating with 20 to 30 percent residue cover on fields.1
Residue Remaining After Tillage
- “Vertical” tillage, a form of conservation tillage, helps size residue while limiting soil disturbance. Vertical tillage tools cut the residue into smaller pieces for even distribution and better soil contact.
- Strip-tillage leaves the soil undisturbed except for narrow strips where tillage and residue removal are performed to facilitate planting. This allows for quicker soil warming in the planting area and helps reduce the potential for equipment-induced compaction.
- Consider the amount of residue remaining after each tillage operation. Chisel plowing can leave about 50 to 85 percent of non-fragile residue (corn or small grains) on the soil surface.2 Approximately 70 to 95 percent of the remaining residue is maintained over winter. Remaining residue is reduced further by 60 to 80 percent with spring cultivation. Multiplying these factors together, an estimated 21 to 65 percent of residue would remain at planting time.
Residue in Continuous Corn Systems
Measuring Residue
It may be helpful to estimate the percentage of crop residue cover. In some areas, about 12 to 20 percent residue is needed to protect relatively flat fields from water erosion. Fields with long or steep slopes may require at least 50 to 60 percent residue cover.8 The Ontario Federation of Agriculture recommends using the line-transect method for estimating percent residue cover. This method involves simple field observations and measurements using a measuring tape, line, or rope that can be marked at 100 equal intervals. Percent cover is determined by counting the number of marks that lie directly over a piece of residue (residue size should be at least the size of a matchstick). For complete details on the line-transect method please refer to the Ontario Federation of Agriculture publication Best Management Practices AF179.1
Summary
Harvest and planting are times to focus on residue management. The benefits of residue have led farmers to use less aggressive tillage to conserve some crop residue. Additional residue management options can be used in continuous corn systems.
Sources
1 Huber, A., King, D., Ribey, M. Best management practices residue management. Ontario Federation of Agriculture. AF179.
2 Eck, K.J. and Brown, D.E. 2004. Managing crop residue with farm machinery. Agronomy Guide. AY-280-W. Purdue University Extension.
3 United States Department of Agriculture. Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2016. Residue and tillage management, no till. Code 329-CPS-2.
4 Rasby, R. J., Drewnoski, M.E., and Stalker, A. 2014. Grazing crop residues with beef cattle. Publication EC278, University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
5 Al-Kaisi, M. 2007. Tillage challenges in managing continuous corn. Iowa State University Extension. Integrated Crop Management.
6 Shen, Y., McLaughlin, N. Zhang, X., Xu, M., and Liang, A. 2018. Effect of tillage and crop residue on soil temperature following planting for a black soil in Northeast China. Scientific Reports. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-22822-8.pdf
7 Al-Kaisi, M. and Hanna, M. 2009. Tips for managing corn residue in continuous corn. Iowa State University. Integrated Crop Management News.
8 Al-Kaisi, M.M., Hanna, M., and Petersen, T.S. 2009. Residue management and cultural practices. Iowa State University Extension, PM 1901a.
Legal Statements
Performance may vary from location to location and from year to year, as local growing, soil and weather conditions may vary. Growers should evaluate data from multiple locations and years whenever possible and should consider the impacts of these conditions on the grower’s fields.
Tank mixtures: The applicable labeling for each product must be in the possession of the user at the time of application. Follow applicable use instructions, including application rates, precautions and restrictions of each product used in the tank mixture. Bayer has not tested all tank mix product formulations for compatibility or performance other than specifically listed by brand name. Always predetermine the compatibility of tank mixtures by mixing small proportional quantities in advance. Bayer and Bayer Cross are registered trademarks of Bayer Group. Used under license. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. ©2021 Bayer Group. All rights reserved. 8008_S2_CA